<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typology and Chronology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/typology-and-chronology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/typology-and-chronology/</link>
	<description>balshanut: Resources for the study of the Bible and Linguistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bekins</title>
		<link>http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/typology-and-chronology/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bekins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Robert,

Thanks for the comment, unfortunately it got caught in my spam filter so I just noticed it now. As you can see, I have already linked to the colloquium in another post. Yes, I have gathered that your views have evolved since the volume on Biblical Hebrew, but it is still on my comp bibliography :). I hope to summarize the more important papers from that book and then discuss the evolution in your positions when I can get my hands on the new book. I am very interested to see some of the details worked out. 

Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, unfortunately it got caught in my spam filter so I just noticed it now. As you can see, I have already linked to the colloquium in another post. Yes, I have gathered that your views have evolved since the volume on Biblical Hebrew, but it is still on my comp bibliography :). I hope to summarize the more important papers from that book and then discuss the evolution in your positions when I can get my hands on the new book. I am very interested to see some of the details worked out. </p>
<p>Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rezetko</title>
		<link>http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/typology-and-chronology/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rezetko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Hi Pete,

Ian Young, Martin Ehrensvärd and I just finished a two week colloquium on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biblical-studies/. The position summary in PDF and subsequent discussion will give you a good idea what we argue in our forthcoming Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts (http://www.equinoxpub.com/books/showbook.asp?bkid=139). Our views have evolved significantly since Young&#039;s edited volume, Biblical Hebrew...

Robert Rezetko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete,</p>
<p>Ian Young, Martin Ehrensvärd and I just finished a two week colloquium on <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biblical-studies/" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biblical-studies/</a>. The position summary in PDF and subsequent discussion will give you a good idea what we argue in our forthcoming Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts (<a href="http://www.equinoxpub.com/books/showbook.asp?bkid=139" rel="nofollow">http://www.equinoxpub.com/books/showbook.asp?bkid=139</a>). Our views have evolved significantly since Young&#8217;s edited volume, Biblical Hebrew&#8230;</p>
<p>Robert Rezetko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
