Comments on: The Study of the Composition of the Pentateuch Part 1: The Documentary Hypothesis http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/ balshanut: Resources for the study of the Bible and Linguistics Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:50:14 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: The Composition of the Pentateuch « Menachem Mendel http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-356 The Composition of the Pentateuch « Menachem Mendel Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:08:02 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-356 [...] 1: The Documentary Hypothesis Part 2: Challenges to the [...] [...] 1: The Documentary Hypothesis Part 2: Challenges to the [...]

]]> By: ntwrong http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-328 ntwrong Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:43:07 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-328 So much for source criticism, then. ...although, could Ska and Bekins go back to a Common Source? So much for source criticism, then. …although, could Ska and Bekins go back to a Common Source?

]]> By: Peter Bekins http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-327 Peter Bekins Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:27:11 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-327 NT, No, actually I didn't use Ska, but you reminded me that I forgot to post my bibliography. I'll try to get to that tomorrow. NT,

No, actually I didn’t use Ska, but you reminded me that I forgot to post my bibliography. I’ll try to get to that tomorrow.

]]> By: ntwrong http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-326 ntwrong Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:10:50 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-326 Do I detect the strong influence of the Ska-source behind your summary? Yours very liberally, etc Do I detect the strong influence of the Ska-source behind your summary?

Yours very liberally, etc

]]> By: Pentateuchal Studies - A Quick Review of the Literature « Hebrew Scriptures and More . . . . http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-325 Pentateuchal Studies - A Quick Review of the Literature « Hebrew Scriptures and More . . . . Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:53:19 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-325 [...] 1) The Study of the Composition of the Pentateuch - Part 1: The Documentary Hypothesis [...] [...] 1) The Study of the Composition of the Pentateuch – Part 1: The Documentary Hypothesis [...]

]]> By: Peter Bekins http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-324 Peter Bekins Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:38:18 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-324 You're lucky I even accept comments from a liberal like you... You’re lucky I even accept comments from a liberal like you…

]]> By: Charles http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-322 Charles Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:20:19 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-322 I think the very fact that you are discussing the documentary hypothesis reveals that this blog is not "fairly conservative" but "very liberal." http://ntwrong.wordpress.com/biblioblogs/ I think the very fact that you are discussing the documentary hypothesis reveals that this blog is not “fairly conservative” but “very liberal.”

http://ntwrong.wordpress.com/biblioblogs/

]]> By: Charles http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-321 Charles Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:06:47 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-321 Sorry Pete, but you slighted Gunkel. I'm deleting you from my RSS reader. ;) Sorry Pete, but you slighted Gunkel. I’m deleting you from my RSS reader. ;)

]]> By: Peter Bekins http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-320 Peter Bekins Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:58:06 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-320 Richard, I'm getting there! Part 1 was just the Documentary Hypothesis. Gunkel comes next. Richard, I’m getting there! Part 1 was just the Documentary Hypothesis. Gunkel comes next.

]]> By: Richard http://balshanut.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-study-of-the-composition-of-the-pentateuch-part-1-the-documentary-hypothesis/#comment-319 Richard Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:35:27 +0000 http://balshanut.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-319 What, no mention of Gunkel!! What, no mention of Gunkel!!

]]>