Mazar and Inscriptions
In my previous post, I assumed that Shmuel Ahituv, a well respected epigrapher, had contributed to the reading of the latest inscription found in Jerusalem since he is quoted authoritatively in the press release. However, the letter read as q is quite clearly r, an odd mistake. Then I remembered this:
“Archaeologist revises read of ancient seal impression”
Note that Mazar erred by reading the seal from right-to-left, but it was a reverse image (it was the seal itself, not the impression). As I think about it more, I think she has made the opposite mistake this time by reading from left-to-right as “Canaanite” in combination with the ridiculous Jebusite narrative. George Athas is correct that this seems to simply be Hebrew read right-to-left as one would expect. See my previous post for the problems with drawing conclusions about language or ethnicity from script typology.
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
September 25, 2019 at 8:45 am
Aw, this was an exceptionally nice post. Spending some time and
actual effort to generate a really good article… but what can I say… I hesitate a lot and don’t manage to get nearly anything
done.